BRAZILIAN TAX REVIEW – MARCH/APRIL 2018

Superior Court of Justice Establishes Criteria for Approval of PIS/COFINS Credits on Inputs

The Superior Court of Justice has taken up the decision of Special Appeal #1.221.170/PR, which deals with the definition of inputs for the purposes of Social Integration Program Tax (Programa de Integração Social), or PIS, and Social Security Financing Tax (Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social), or COFINS, credits.

In the decision, which was submitted to the system for repetitive binding appeals, the court solidified the position that using the credits must observe the criteria of the essentiality or relevance of the expense for the taxpayer’s activities.

The Superior Court of Justice also approved the following thesis that summarizes the issue: “The definition of input must be determined in light of the criteria of the essentiality or relevance, taking into account the importance of a given item, good or service for the conduct of the taxpayer’s economic activity.”

Although the appellate decision has not yet been formalized and will need to be analyzed to determine the real scope of the decision, it is nonetheless true that the Superior Court of Justice’s position is favorable to taxpayers and could open a path to recovering amounts overpaid in the past and to reducing PIS/COFINS amounts paid monthly by companies.

PGFN Issues Regulations for Freezing Assets without a Court Order

Attorney General’s Office for the National Treasury (Procuradoria-Geral da Fazenda Nacional), or PGFN, Ordinance 33/2018 regulates the procedures for freezing debtors’ assets without seeking a court order, under Law 13,606/18. With this ordinance, the treasury can record the debt in real and chattel property registries immediately after it has been listed as a past-due debt, even before a tax execution action has been filed.

The constitutionality of this measure has already been challenged before the Federal Supreme Court, under the argument that the so-called “pre-execution recording” violates the principles of due process, adversary proceedings, a broad defense and separation of powers, among others.

OECD/G20 and the European Commission Publish Reports about the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy

On March 16, 2018, the OECD published an intermediary report about the tax challenges arising under the digital economy, as a continuation to the studies published in BEPS Action 1.

The report discusses how digitalization affects all the areas of tax systems, to provide new service tools to the tax authorities and to taxpayers and to increase the efficiency of identifying tax evasion and of collecting taxes.

A few days later, on March 21, 2018, the European commission proposed new rules to ensure that digital business activities are taxed fairly and in a way that favors growth in the European Union. The suggested measures include a joint reform of the European rules for the taxation of corporate entities in so-called digital economy activities, such as the creation of a definition of a virtual permanent establishment and rules for the allocation of profit among the member states, as well as a provisional tax on certain revenue from digital activities. These suggestions will be submitted for deliberation.

PGFN Regulates Transfer of Real Property in Payment of Tax Debts

The Attorney General’s Office for the National Treasury (Procuradoria-Geral da Fazenda Nacional), or PGFN, has published PGFN Ordinance 32/2018, which states the conditions and requirements for indebted taxpayers to transfer real property as payment. The ordinance covers nontax and tax debts listed as past-due, whether or not subject to a court decision, except those that originated under the “National Simple” system.

Among the provisions that should be noted is the requirement that the taxpayer release a claim to any overpayment if the appraisal price of the real property is greater than the debt to be extinguished, and the requirement that, if there has been a deposit into court, the real property can be used only for the balance not covered by the deposit.

Seeking Greater Exchange of Information, Brazil Approves Protocols in Treaties to Avoid Double Taxation with India, South Korea and South Africa

The presidential decree implementing the protocol that amends the Convention to Avoid Double Taxation between Brazil and India has been published. Additionally, the Brazilian Senate has ratified similar protocols in the conventions with South Korea and South Africa (a presidential decree is still needed to bring these latter two protocols into effect).

In all three cases, the protocols are intended to update and expand the reach of the article concerning the exchange of information among the tax authorities of Brazil and the other countries, allowing the signatories greater access to information that is material to collecting taxes in their countries.

Brazil Expands its Social Security Agreement Network

Brazil has signed a social security agreement with Israel, which still needs to be ratified by the Brazilian Senate and implemented through a presidential decree before it becomes effective. Additionally, the Brazilian Senate has ratified a Social Security Agreement between Brazil and Luxembourg, which is still awaiting a presidential decree.

These agreements give each country’s workers who are resident in the territory of the other country the opportunity to take advantage of the contribution periods in the two countries to obtain the social security benefit.

Brazil Potentially Joining the OECD Entails an Important Work Program to Study Local Transfer Pricing Rules

The OECD and the Brazilian government have launched the project “Transfer Pricing in Brazil,” with the following objectives over the course of three phases: (i) to analyze the legal and administrative framework in effect in Brazil; (ii) to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses; and (iii) to explore options for closer alignment between Brazil and OECD member countries.

This work program was created in the context of Brazil potentially joining the OECD. Since there are important differences between the transfer pricing rules used in Brazil and OECD guidelines, the OECD has chosen to create this program to better understand the differences and avoid double taxation and practices that hide profit.

CARF Decides that Revenue from Travel Agencies Is Restricted to Commissions

The Administrative Tax Appeals Board (Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais), or CARF, has taken up an appeal filed by a travel agency in which the composition of the company’s revenue is at issue.

The taxpayer was issued an infraction notice by Brazilian Federal Revenue for not having included all of the amounts received by the agency in the sale of tourist packages, which include the amounts passed on to hotels, airlines, tourism operators, etc., in its taxable operating revenue. In its challenge, the taxpayer argued that those amounts were not its own revenue but that of third parties, with its own operating result consisting exclusively of the commissions received for this intermediation service.

On the merits of the case, the CARF board granted the taxpayer’s appeal, recognizing that, in fact, the travel agency should recognize revenue only in relation to the commissions on the sales. Brazilian Federal Revenue’s position on this matter was therefore rejected.

Voluntary Admission Does Not Apply to Special Customs Methods

The Superior Chamber of the Administrative Tax Appeals Board (Conselho Administrativo de Recursos Fiscais), or CARF, has analyzed a case in which the taxpayer was issued an infraction notice with a fine for failing to comply with the deadline for exporting a good under a temporary admission customs method. In the appeal, the taxpayer claimed that the penalty should be lifted because it made a voluntary admission of its failure.

However, the CARF maintained the infraction notice on the argument that the institute of voluntary admission eliminates requirements related only to the principal obligation and does not impede the application of customs fines.

BRAZILIAN TAX REVIEW – JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018

States Make Progress in Resolving the ICMS “Tax war”

Following the rules in Supplementary Law 160/2017, the states have approved an agreement (ICMS Convention 190/2017) that establishes rules for validating tax incentives granted improperly, as well as authorizing the granting of amnesty and the forgiveness of past debts.

This convention sets a deadline for the states to disclose all the tax incentives they have granted in recent years without certification by the National Council for Fiscal Policy (Conselho Nacional de Política Fazendária), or CONFAZ, as well as to register them with that body, in order to disclose them to all taxpayers.

Once this has been done, the tax incentives will have an effective term according to the nature of the activity with which they are connected (industry, commerce, etc.).

Because the convention has been approved, it is essential that taxpayers who use tax incentives that have not been properly approved verify whether their incentives have been listed among those disclosed to and recorded with CONFAZ. Taxpayers should also determine whether they can adhere to a tax benefit that reduces their ICMS tax burden, particularly if direct competitors are taking advantage of such a tax break.

Attorney General’s Office for the National Treasury Can Freeze Taxpayers’ Assets without a Court Order

Law 13,606/2018, which was passed recently, authorizes the Brazilian Treasury to record past-due debt certificates at agencies that record assets and rights subject to attachment or lien (for example, real estate and automobile registry offices), making these assets unavailable, before a tax execution action is filed.

In practice, the law authorizes the Attorney General’s Office for the National Treasury to make the assets of debtors unavailable when those debtors have been notified that they have been placed on the list of people with past-due federal tax debts (or in other words, before the tax execution action) and have not paid the debt within five days of receiving the notice. Moreover, the law authorizes the Brazilian Treasury to notify credit bureaus regarding debts placed on the past-due federal tax list.

This controversial measure could be challenged in court because it appears to conflict with provisions of the Brazilian Constitution and National Tax Code.

The State of São Paulo Regulates the ICMS Tax on Digital Goods

In keeping with Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services Convention 106/2017, the state of São Paulo has published in-state regulations governing the collection of the Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços), or ICMS, on what are referred to as digital goods. These include standardized software, computer programs, digital games, apps, electronic files, etc.

Under the new rules, the platform that digitally transfers these goods, even if this is done by means of periodic payments, must pay the tax to the state in which the recipient of the goods is located.

These provisions provide even more fodder for discussions concerning the “tax war” among the states and municipalities. This is because a large part of the services covered by the decree are considered services subject to taxation by municipalities under the Service Tax (Imposto sobre Serviços), or ISS.

The decree goes into effect on April 1, 2018, with the collection of taxes on these transactions being expected from that date.

Notwithstanding the fact that this tax is to take effect very soon, there are lawsuits before the Brazilian Supreme Court seeking to suspend or even cancel the ICMS tax levy on digital goods. These lawsuits are based not only on conflicts with the ISS tax legislation, but also on the fact that there is no law to implement the tax and on arguments that the ICMS tax should not be levied on intangible goods.

Important Changes to the List of Jurisdictions with Favorable Taxation and Privileged Tax Systems

Normative Instruction RFB 1,773/2017 excludes Singapore, Costa Rica and Madeira from the list of countries or dependencies with favorable taxation (the blacklist).

On the other hand, the normative instruction includes certain tax systems from these countries on the list of privileged systems (the gray list). These are: the Free Trade Zone System of Costa Rica, the Madeira International Business Center, established under Portuguese law, and various systems that exist under the law of Singapore.

Brazilian Federal Revenue Issues a Regulation on the Tax Effects of Financial Reporting Standards on Accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers (IFRS 15)

Normative Instruction RFB 1,771 governs the tax rules regarding accounting entries under Accounting Standards Committee Pronouncement 47 (IFRS 15) on revenue from contracts with customers, which was issued in November 2016 and becomes effective in January 2018.

This normative instruction approves the model statements to be used by taxpayers in controlling the differences between the corporate criteria and the criteria in effect for tax purposes regarding revenue, costs and expenses, and the respective adjustments under the laws governing this matter.

Brazilian Supreme Court Suspends New Rules for the ICMS-ST Tax

The Chief Justice of the Brazilian Supreme Court issued a preliminary injunction suspending certain provisions of Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services Convention 52/2017, which sought to make the rules relative to the tax substitution method for the Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services (Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços), or ICMS, uniform.

The suspended provisions include the controversial rule requiring the inclusion of the tax in its own calculation basis. In practical terms, this increased the amount of tax paid in certain situations. The main reason given by the Chief Justice of the Brazilian Supreme Court was the need to issue a supplementary law to deal with the matters included in the convention.

The decision will be reevaluated by the reporting justice chosen for the hearing of the challenge to the convention’s constitutionality when the Supreme Court returns from recess.

Important Changes in ISS Law in the Municipality of São Paulo

São Paulo Municipal Law 16,757/2017 made important changes in that municipality’s Service Tax (Imposto sobre Serviços), or ISS, law by adopting the changes made by Federal Supplementary Law 157/2016 at the municipal level.

Among other matters dealt with, the list of services subject to the ISS tax has been updated to include making content available through streaming (item 1.09) and publishing advertising on the Internet (item 17.24).

Under São Paulo municipal law, all information technology services will be taxed at a 2.9% rate, as will the services under item 17.24.

Moreover, the new law changes the place of payment of the ISS tax for certain, specific activities. These include health insurance plans, credit and debit card administration and commercial leasing, among others, in keeping with Federal Supplementary Law 157/2016. Certain rules regarding the “tax war” among municipalities have also been included.

Brazilian Federal Revenue Ratifies Its Position on the Taxation of Licensing for the Commercialization and Distribution of Foreign Software in Brazil

Through Interpretive Declaratory Act RFB 07/2017, Brazilian Federal Revenue has ratified and formalized its position that payments sent abroad as consideration for licensing for the commercialization or distribution of software are royalties. This means they are subject to the withholding tax at a rate of 15%.

The new rule also clarifies that, if the beneficiary of the payment is resident or domiciled in a country with favorable tax treatment, the withholding tax rate for the transaction will be 25%.

Brazilian Federal Revenue Simplifies the Rules for Offsetting Income Tax Paid Abroad against the Brazilian Corporate Income Tax (IRPJ)

Normative Instruction RFB 1,772/2017, which was issued recently, makes changes to the procedures for offsetting income tax paid abroad on profit, income and capital gains received by corporate entities domiciled in Brazil.

Under this normative instruction, corporate entities established in countries that are parties to the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents are released from the obligation of having the documents that prove payment recognized by the respective agency collecting the payment and by the Brazilian consulate. All that will be necessary now in these cases is an apostille on the payment document and a sworn translation.

Authentication and recognition of the documents continue to be necessary for countries that are not party to the Hague Convention.

GSGA – SPECIAL REPORT – BRAZILIAN TAX REVIEW 03/2014 – APRIL/MAY/JUNE –

Taxation of Profits of Controlled Foreign Companies (CFC): Double Taxation Conventions must prevail over domestic rules

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has recently decided a case involving the applicability of Brazilian CFC rules in cases in which the controlled company is located in a country with which Brazil has a Convention for Avoidance of Double Taxation (DTC).

Under the STJ decision, whenever there is a valid DTC, the profits calculated by a controlled company cannot be taxed in Brazil by the parent company since, in these cases, the DTC provisions must prevail over domestic legislation. Consequently, based on the application of DTC provisions, the STJ held that these profits will be taxed only in the residence of the controlled company.

However, it should be noted that, although this precedent is favorable to taxpayers, this issue is not yet settled in Brazilian courts. This is especially so since federal attorneys are still appealing these cases in order to bring this matter before the Supreme Court (STF).

Tax Effects of IFRS adjustments and Changes in CFC rules converted into Law 12,973.

On May 14, 2014, Provisional Measure 627/13 was converted into Law 12,973. As we have mentioned on other occasions, this Provisional Measure introduced a number of changes to Brazilian tax legislation in order to harmonize the calculation of Corporate Income Tax (“IRPJ”), Social Tax on Net Profit (“CSLL”), Social Integration Program Tax (“PIS”) and Social Security Financing Tax (“COFINS”) with IFRS criteria. Apart from these changes, the new rule also extinguished the Transitional Tax System (RTT) and introduced a new tax on controlled foreign companies (CFCs).

These changes in legislation will come into force in 2015. However, taxpayers may choose to apply these changes already for the 2014 tax year. According to Normative Ruling 1,469, taxpayers who choose to anticipate the effects of the new law for 2014 should formalize this option though their tax return (DCTF – Federal Tax Credits and Debits Statement) for taxes due in May, for which the deadline is July 21.

Swiss Entities that Are Considered Established under a Privileged Tax System)

On June 6, 2010, the Brazilian government issued a new blacklist under Normative Ruling (“Instrução Normativa”) 1,037/2010, which included Switzerland as a tax haven.

However, in response to a Swiss government request, Brazilian tax authorities immediately suspended Switzerland’s blacklisted status under Normative Ruling (“Ato Declaratório Executivo”) 11/2010, until a further review proceeding could be completed.

This review proceeding was concluded on June 20, 2014, and the Brazilian government issued Normative Ruling (“Instrução Normativa”) 1,474/2014, which repealed Switzerland’s blacklisted status. However, entities incorporated in Switzerland were included in a grey list (they are considered to be established under a Privileged Tax System) in the following cases:

 When they are a holding company, domiciliary company, auxiliary company, mixed company or administrative company subject to a combined corporate income tax rate lower than 20% under federal, cantonal and municipal legislation; and
 When they are other types of legal entities that are authorized by rulings issued by tax authorities and subject to a combined corporate income tax rate lower than 20%.

As a consequence, transactions between a Brazilian entity and a grey-listed Swiss entity are subject to transfer pricing rules. Also, the tax deductibility of interest expenses related to loan agreements with a grey-listed Swiss entity that are incurred by a Brazilian entity is subject to thin capitalization rules. In both cases, it does not matter whether the parties are related.

Additionally, the thin capitalization rules governing the tax deductibility limitations of the interest expenses related to loans agreements with grey-listed lenders are more severe than the limitations for loan agreements with related parties established in places or under systems not classified as black or grey listed.

Government Reduces the IOF Rate levied on Foreign Loans to Zero

On 3 June 2014, the Brazilian government enacted Decree 8,263, reducing the rate of the Tax on Financial Transactions (IOF/Foreign Exchange) levied on loans agreements with maturity of over 180 days to zero. Before this decree, the zero rate was applicable, as a general rule, to loans with maturity of over 360 days.

São Paulo Simplifies State Drawback Procedures

The São Paulo State Treasury Office issued Decree 60,393, to introduce changes to the procedures importers must comply with in order to be granted with ICMS exemption on imports under the drawback regime.

With these changes, it is no longer necessary to formally file the Import Declaration (DI), the Tax Invoices and the Drawback Grant Instrument with state authorities. However, importers must keep these documents for at least for five years.

Brazil launches International Trade Single Window

Brazilian authorities have recently launched the International Trade Single Window, which will be implemented to bring together all systems involved in import and export procedures in order to simplify these transactions and reduce import/export customs clearance time.

SECEX revokes regulation on legal representation in trade defense procedures

The Foreign Trade Secretariat (SECEX) has revoked SECEX Ordinance 02/2014, which regulates the legal representation of interested parties (domestic or foreign) in trade defense procedures regarding antidumping and compensatory measures.